Indian Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Register      Login

VOLUME 24 , ISSUE 3 ( September, 2013 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Evaluation of Mirror Therapy for Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Stroke

Laisram Nonica, Muzaffar Tufail, RK Wadhwa, Borah Diganta, SY Kothari

Citation Information : Nonica L, Tufail M, Wadhwa R, Diganta B, Kothari S. Evaluation of Mirror Therapy for Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Stroke. Indian J Phy Med Rehab 2013; 24 (3):63-69.

DOI: 10.5005/ijopmr-24-3-63

Published Online: 00-09-2013

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2013; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Trials have shown modest clinical improvement in disabilities after stroke with the use of different techniques; however most of the treatment protocols for the paretic upper extremity are either expensive or labour intensive, which makes the provision of intensive treatment for many patients difficult. It has been suggested that mirror therapy is a simple, inexpensive and, most importantly patient-directed treatment that may improve upper extremity function.

A prospective randomised case control study was done on 60 patients of both the sexes in the age group of 19 to 82 years having stroke for the first time. This study was conducted in the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation of a tertiary care hospital. All the patients who fulfilled the criteria were enrolled for study; patients were randomly allotted to the study or control group. Study group was given mirror therapy in addition to the conventional stroke rehabilitation programme. Patients were assessed in terms of motor recovery (Brunnstrom stages), spasticity (modified Ashworth Scale), and the self-care items of the Barthel index. These indices were measured at 0 month (pretreatment), 1 month (post-treatment), and 6 months (follow-up).

There was a statistically significant difference in spasticity improvement between the study and control groups; however no significant difference was seen in motor recovery and self care items between the groups. The patients had significant improvements within the groups after the therapy for one month.

Mirror therapy can be a useful intervention supplement in rehabilitation of patients; it provides a simple and cost effective therapy for recovery of hand function.


PDF Share
  1. Stroke incidence, case fatality, and mortality: the WHO MONICA Project. Stroke 1995; 26: 361-7.
  2. Stroke historical perspectives. Crit Care Nurse 2003; 26: 268-75.
  3. Stroke care: experiences and clinical research in stroke units in Chennai. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2006;9:293-8.
  4. Functional electrical stimulation improves motor recovery of the lower extremity and walking ability of subjects with first acute stroke: a randomized placebo controlled trial. Stroke 2005;36:80-5.
  5. Upper and lower extremity robotic devices for rehabilitation and for studying motor control. Curr Opin Neurol 2003;16:705-10.
  6. Effects of non invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Brain 2005;128:490-9.
  7. Do electrically stimulated sensory inputs and movements lead to long term plasticity and rehabilitation gains. Curr Opin Neurol 2003;16:685-92.
  8. Rehabilitation after Stroke. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1677-84.
  9. Mental imagery for promoting relearning for people after stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1403-8.
  10. Role of the premotor cortex in recovery from middle cerebral artery infarction. Arch Neurol 1998;55:1081-8.
  11. Lancet 1999;353:2035-6.
  12. Mirror therapy improves hand function in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89:393-8.
  13. Influence of mirror therapy on human motor cortex. Int J Neurosci 2007;117:1039-48.
  14. Doing it with mirrors: a case study of a novel approach to neurorehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2000;14:73-6
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.