Indian Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Register      Login

VOLUME 27 , ISSUE 3 ( September, 2016 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

Upper Extremity Prosthesis — What Is New in It?

S. Abdul Gafoor, M Mohan Raj

Citation Information : Gafoor SA, Mohan Raj M. Upper Extremity Prosthesis — What Is New in It?. Indian J Phy Med Rehab 2016; 27 (3):67-72.

DOI: 10.5005/ijopmr-27-3-67

Published Online: 00-09-2016

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2016; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Over the past 40 years, technology has dramatically affected the field of upper limb prosthesis. With improvement in the electronics industry, along with advances in the miniaturisation and mass production of electronic components, myoelectrically controlled prosthesis has become reliable and widespread in their use. Compared to lower extremity amputees, the acceptance of prosthetic replacement is less in upper extremity amputees. This may be due to different factors like functional needs, cosmetic factors, motivation of the patient, inadequate training following conventional prosthetic fitment, etc. More and more developments are going on in upper limb extremity prosthesis which will fulfill the need of the upper limb amputees. Such developments ensure better rehabilitation though cost is a limiting factor. This article is an earnest attempt to review the recent trends in upper limb prosthetics.


PDF Share
  1. Historical aspects of powered limb prostheses clin. Prosthetics Orthotics 1985, 9; 2-13.
  2. Powered Upper Limb Prostheses: Control, Implementation and Clinical Application Berlin Heidelberg: Springer – Verlag 2004.
  3. Myoelectric control systems: a survey. Biomed Signal Process Control 2007;2:275-94. Upper Extremity Prosthesis – What Is New in It? _ S. Abdul Gafoor et al
  4. A real-time comparison between direct control, sequential pattern recognition control and simultaneous pattern recognition control using a Fitts’ law style assessment procedure. J Neur Eng Rehabil, 2014;11:91.
  5. Comparative analysis of microprocessors in upper limb prosthetics. JPO 2003;15:48-65,
  6. Functional comparison of upper extremity amputees using myoelectric and conventional prostheses. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983;64:243-8.
  7. myoelectricprosthetics.com/
  8. Assessment of capacity for Myoelectric control: evaluation of construct and rating scale, J Rehabil Med 2009;41:467-74.
  9. Targeted muscle reinnervation for real time myoelectric control of multifunction artificial arms. JAMA, 2009;301:
  10. Prosthesisguided training of pattern recognition-controlled myoelectric prosthesis: Conf Proc IEEE. Eng Med Biol Soc 2012;12:1876-9.
  11. -Richard Gray for Mailonline Published: 13:38 Gmt, 8 March 2016.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.