Indian Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Register      Login

VOLUME 31 , ISSUE 2 ( April-June, 2020 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Comparison of the Therapeutic Efficacy of TENS vs Ultrasound-guided Genicular Nerve Block in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis

Ishita Dey, Vasundhara Ghosal, Ambar Konar, Rajesh Pramanik

Keywords : Genicular nerve, Knee pain, Osteoarthritis, Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, Ultrasonography

Citation Information : Dey I, Ghosal V, Konar A, Pramanik R. Comparison of the Therapeutic Efficacy of TENS vs Ultrasound-guided Genicular Nerve Block in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis. Indian J Phy Med Rehab 2020; 31 (2):38-41.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10066-0073

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 25-06-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; The Author(s).


Introduction: Osteoarthritis (OA) knee is a common disease of the aged population and one of the leading causes of disability. There are various treatment modalities to manage the pain in this condition including transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and genicular nerve block (GNB). Aims and objectives: To assess and compare the effect of ultrasound-guided GNB and repeated daily TENS for 3 weeks in chronic knee pain in patients with OA knee. Materials and methods: The study is a randomized clinical trial done over duration of 18 months in the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation; IPGMER and SSKMH with a total sample size of 64 patients (32 in each group). Patients of age 40–80 years suffering from symptomatic primary OA knee with K/L score 3 and 4, poorly responding to conservative treatments and devoid of any exclusion criteria were included in the trial. After ethics committee clearance and obtaining informed consent, 64 patients were randomized into 2 treatment groups. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation was applied for 3 weeks in the first group. In the second group, a US-guided GNB was done. Pain and knee function were assessed with visual acuity scale (VAS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities index at baseline, 1, and 3 months. Results: Statistically significant reduction in VAS and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) detected over time in both groups. WOMAC was significantly better in the GNB group than in TENS at 1-month follow-up. Conclusion: Both TENS and GNB have good clinical effects on knee OA with the superiority of GNB.

  1. Toledo SD, Trapani K, Feldbruegge. E. Rheumatic diseases. Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Braddom RL, ed., ch. 36 4th ed. 2010, p. 770.
  2. Bruyère O, Cooper C, Pelletier JP, et al. An algorithm recommendation for the management of knee osteoarthritis in Europe and internationally: a report from a task force of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO). Semin Arthritis Rheum 2014;44(3):253–263. DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2014.05.014.
  3. Pedersen AB, Mehnert F, Sorensen HT, et al. The risk of venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, stroke, major bleeding and death in patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement: a 15-year retrospective cohort study of routine clinical practice. Bone Joint J 2014;96-B(4):479–485. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B4.33209.
  4. McCartney CJ, Nelligan K. Postoperative pain management after total knee arthroplasty in elderly patients: treatment options. Drugs Aging 2014;31(2):83–91. DOI: 10.1007/s40266-013-0148-y Hawker GA. The nerve of osteoarthritis pain. Arthritis Care Res 2010;62:1019–1023.
  5. Philadelphia Panel. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on selected rehabilitation interventions for knee pain. Phys Ther 2001;81:1675–1700.
  6. Taylor P, Hallett M, Flaaherty L. Treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Pain 1981;11(2):233–240. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(81)90008-7.
  7. Kennedy JC, Alexander IJ, Hayes KC. Nerve supply of the human knee and its functional importance. Am J Sports Med 1982;10(6):329–335. DOI: 10.1177/036354658201000601.
  8. Protzman NM, Gyi J, Malhotra AD, et al. Examining the feasibility of radiofrequency treatment for chronic knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. PM&R 2014;6(4):373–376. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.10.003.
  9. Hirasawa Y, Okajima S, Ohta M, et al. Nerve distribution to the humanknee joint: Anatomical and immunohistochemicalstudy. Int Orthop 2000;24(1):1–4. DOI: 10.1007/s002640050001.
  10. Altman R, Hochberg M, Moskowitz R, et al. Recommendations for the medical management of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee: 2000 update. Arthritis Rheum 2000;43(9):1905–1915. DOI: 10.1002/1529-0131(200009)43:9<1905::AID-ANR1>3.0.CO;2-P.
  11. Jensen H, Zesler R, Christensen T. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TNS) for painful osteoarthrosis of the knee. Int J Rehabil Res 1991;14(4):356–358. DOI: 10.1097/00004356-199112000- 00013.
  12. Yasar E, Kesikburun S, Kılıç C, et al. Accuracy of ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block: a cadaveric study. Pain Physician 2015;18:E899–E904.
  13. Choi WJ, Hwang SJ, Song JG, et al. Radiofrequency treatment relieves chronic knee osteoarthritis pain: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Pain 2011;152(3):481–487. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.09.029.
  14. Paker N, Tekdös D, Kesiktas N, et al. Comparison of the therapeutic efficacy of TENS versus intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a prospective randomized study. Adv Ther 2006;23(2):342–353. DOI: 10.1007/BF02850139.
  15. Kesikburun S, Yaşar E, Uran A, et al. Ultrasound-guided genicular nerve pulsed radiofrequency treatment for painful knee osteoarthritis: a preliminary report. Pain Physic 2016;19(5):E751–E759.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.